[EN] How do you rate people and their good and bad actions?

How do you rate someone who does good and bad things? Let's imagine ... Let's imagine that a person, your partner, a company, a government do more good things than bad ... at the end of the day, nobody is perfect. Let's imagine that good and bad actions or characteristics are measurable/quantifiable, and every month this person or company or government does the equivalent of 4 good things and two bad things. For example, your partner cooks +1, cleans +1 and works +2, but forgot to take out the empty milk container -2.

4 different ways to take good and bad actions

In the graph shown there are four possible responses to the situation, in diagram A it is shown that each time four good points and two bad points are added, some would think that it is fair, but it has a couple of problems. There comes a point where we stop counting the good points and only the bad points count increases, and we get angry that they keep leaving the empty container in the refrigerator, even though they continue to cook every day, and it is time for an explosion of anger.

In diagram B, a less favorable situation in which bad actions have a greater weight than good actions, and the breaking point is reached even faster, it is easy to think that someone who makes the same mistakes several times will re-offend, deserves not to have more opportunities, but sometimes the good that is repeated is not seen in the same way, cooking every day stops being a virtue and becomes everyday.

In diagram C, someone who only adds up the balance does not hold any kind of grudge for bad actions, as long as the good actions are more. They say that a problem with this is that forgotten mistakes are repeated, that in naive and even stupid, that someone else can take advantage of one.

In diagram D something that happens more often with governments and jobs, the person focuses on the bad, and forgets the good. The president speaks and says something stupid, what does it matter that he fulfills another promise, what does it matter if he reduces the debt, they said that crap. Or, in the example of a relationship, you are late. It may be that he is a good, calm, hard-working person, but he is late and they cannot stand it.

I do not know which is the correct way, all approaches have a reason to follow them, that they do not abuse us, that mistakes are not repeated, that the bad outweighs the good, that what we cannot bear we cannot bear...

I will continue to think that the correct thing is C, forgetting and letting the bad pass, as long as the good is more, I believe that only in this way is lived fully.